← Back to competitions
WRITING & COMMUNICATIONINTERNATIONAL / OTHERVerification pending · Last checked 19 Sept 2026

Stossel in the Classroom Student Contests

Rated Intermediate, This programme offers three distinct ways to build and communicate an argument: a conventional essay, a short video, or a documented AI inquiry with reflection. Track-specific grade rules apply to students in the United States, Canada, and U.S. military communities abroad, with direct online submission. Strong entries need a clear position, credible supporting material, original judgment, and disciplined communication in the chosen medium.

Information pending verification

Competition details can change. Always confirm dates, eligibility and entry requirements on the official organiser's website.

Official website ↗

LEVEL BY DIVISION

Intermediate Level

01

Competition overview

Key information

Eligible ages

10–22

School level

Grades 5-12 and undergraduate, depending on track

Registration method

Individual Allowed

Competition stages

Separate essay, video, and AI challenge tracks

Fee

Free

Online / in-person

Online

02

Dates

Competition timeline

Registration opens

Not yet announced by the organiser

Registration closes

13 Mar 2027

Competition starts

19 Jan 2027

Competition ends

31 May 2027

03

Editorial perspective

Our Take

Stossel in the Classroom runs three student contests under one umbrella: an essay competition, a short-video competition and an AI challenge. They share an interest in public questions and independent reasoning, but they do not reward the same work in different packaging. The editorial decision that matters most is choosing which track makes a student's thinking clearer rather than choosing the newest or most comfortable medium. The essay track gives sustained argument room to breathe. The video track adds voice, pace, image and production choices. The AI challenge is more unusual: the submitted evidence includes a conversation with an approved system and a reflection on what the exchange revealed. In that track, clever prompting is not enough; the student must show judgment about the tool's answers and about their own reasoning. The programme is worth watching because it does not present AI as a universal shortcut. Its rules draw different boundaries for different forms. That makes authorship part of the intellectual task. A strong entrant should be able to point to the decisions, research and revisions that belong to them, regardless of whether the finished artifact is prose, video or a documented dialogue.

Read full guide →
Source information

Related blog posts

Guide

Stossel student contests: choose the medium that sharpens the argument

Read article →