Stossel in the Classroom Student Contests
Rated Intermediate, This programme offers three distinct ways to build and communicate an argument: a conventional essay, a short video, or a documented AI inquiry with reflection. Track-specific grade rules apply to students in the United States, Canada, and U.S. military communities abroad, with direct online submission. Strong entries need a clear position, credible supporting material, original judgment, and disciplined communication in the chosen medium.
Information pending verification
Competition details can change. Always confirm dates, eligibility and entry requirements on the official organiser's website.
Official website ↗LEVEL BY DIVISION
Intermediate Level
Competition overview
Key information
Eligible ages
10–22
School level
Grades 5-12 and undergraduate, depending on track
Registration method
Individual Allowed
Competition stages
Separate essay, video, and AI challenge tracks
Fee
Free
Online / in-person
Online
Dates
Competition timeline
Registration opens
Not yet announced by the organiser
Registration closes
13 Mar 2027
Competition starts
19 Jan 2027
Competition ends
31 May 2027
Editorial perspective
Our Take
Stossel in the Classroom runs three student contests under one umbrella: an essay competition, a short-video competition and an AI challenge. They share an interest in public questions and independent reasoning, but they do not reward the same work in different packaging. The editorial decision that matters most is choosing which track makes a student's thinking clearer rather than choosing the newest or most comfortable medium. The essay track gives sustained argument room to breathe. The video track adds voice, pace, image and production choices. The AI challenge is more unusual: the submitted evidence includes a conversation with an approved system and a reflection on what the exchange revealed. In that track, clever prompting is not enough; the student must show judgment about the tool's answers and about their own reasoning. The programme is worth watching because it does not present AI as a universal shortcut. Its rules draw different boundaries for different forms. That makes authorship part of the intellectual task. A strong entrant should be able to point to the decisions, research and revisions that belong to them, regardless of whether the finished artifact is prose, video or a documented dialogue.
Read full guide →