Guide
Breakthrough Junior Challenge: How to Explain a Big Idea in Two Minutes
A practical guide to the two-minute science video, 2026 eligibility, peer review and what the judging criteria really demand.
Competition Guides
A flexible six-week structure for real investigation, reflection and student-led presentation
SciFest@School is the most flexible part of the SciFest programme because the school chooses when to hold its in-house fair, which year groups take part and how large the event should be. That flexibility makes it useful for schools that want a genuine project experience without beginning with travel or a regional deadline. Students can enter alone or in teams of up to three, investigate a STEM question and explain their work to an audience within the school. The fair can be small; the value comes from completing the cycle of asking, testing, revising and presenting.
Registration for the 2026/2027 school programme is available, and a SciFest@School event may be held at any time during the academic year. It should not be misrepresented as a required qualifying round for SciFest@College: schools may select projects to progress, but students can also enter a regional college fair directly. CompeteMap sees the school format as particularly useful for first-time project students and mixed-ability groups because teachers can set a realistic scale while preserving student ownership. The main risk is turning it into a poster exercise completed at the last minute. A worthwhile programme gives students enough time to collect evidence, encounter a problem, change something and explain what they learned.
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Competition | SciFest@School 2026/27 |
| Organiser | SciFest; delivered as an in-house school fair |
| Typical students | Any participating school year group, as determined by the school |
| Format | Individual or team STEM projects presented at a school-run fair |
| Best for | First project experience, whole-year enrichment or preparation for a regional fair |
| Difficulty | A manageable but genuine project cycle, with the school able to adjust scaffolding and scale |
Rated Intermediate. The organiser gives schools substantial flexibility over timing, scale and year groups, which keeps entry accessible. Students still need to define a project, gather evidence and communicate it. The level reflects a meaningful independent task with teacher scaffolding, below the comparative pressure of a regional exhibition.
The SciFest@School 2026/27 listing is an in-house STEM fair rather than one fixed national event. Official terms state that a registered school can hold it at any time of year, include any year group and decide the number of projects. Students may work individually or in groups of two or three.
This means there is no single perfect model. A school might run a six-week first-year science project, make the fair part of Transition Year, invite entries from several subjects or use it as a smaller rehearsal before regional participation. The design should match the time, staffing, space and equipment genuinely available.
The school can invite judges from local industry, higher education or its own community, while following safeguarding procedures. SciFest provides support and resources for registered schools. Current arrangements should always be confirmed through the official registration and teacher-information pages.
Schools may identify projects at their own event that they wish to enter in SciFest@College. However, the official terms state that attending SciFest@School is not mandatory for college entry. This distinction matters for planning and for how results are described to students.
The school event is controlled locally and can emphasise participation, feedback and learning. A SciFest@College regional fair brings together projects from different schools at an external venue with its own entry process and rules. Progression can be an aspiration without making every school participant feel that only the selected projects were worthwhile.
An open instruction such as “make a science project” can leave beginners paralysed. A narrow prescribed experiment removes ownership. The useful middle ground is a broad theme plus constraints. For example: investigate a problem connected to school energy use, local biodiversity, assistive technology, food waste or everyday materials, using evidence that can be gathered safely within six weeks.
Before approving an idea, ask the student to complete four sentences:
These prompts reveal whether the project is feasible. They also help teachers identify work that needs specialist supervision, permission or a change of method.
Students who are stuck can use How to Find a Science Fair Project Idea. The goal is not to import a ready-made experiment but to turn an interest into a question with observable evidence.
Students investigate the background, define a narrow question and check materials, safety, time and access. Teachers approve or redirect the plan before data collection begins.
Run a small pilot. This exposes unclear measurements, unavailable equipment and unrealistic sample sizes while there is still time to change course.
Collect data, build and test versions, or document the development process. Keep dated notes and raw results. A team should record who did what without splitting understanding into separate compartments.
Turn measurements into appropriate tables or graphs, compare outcomes with the original expectation and identify limitations. Engineering teams should compare prototypes against criteria defined earlier.
Build the display around the question, method, evidence, conclusion and next step. Rehearse a short explanation and questions. Do not spend the whole final week decorating a board while the reasoning remains unclear.
Schools with less time can compress the schedule, but should preserve the pilot and reflection stages. Those are where much of the learning happens.
Teachers create the conditions for safe, feasible work; they should not become the hidden project team. Appropriate support includes helping students narrow a question, checking risk, teaching a needed technique, challenging an interpretation and arranging access to equipment. The student should still choose between options, keep the record and explain the final decisions.
Parents and outside mentors should follow the same boundary. If specialist advice is used, acknowledge it. A student who can clearly say what help they received and what they decided themselves demonstrates stronger ownership than one presenting adult-polished work.
For younger or less experienced groups, provide common mini-lessons on fair testing, graph choice, sources and presentation. Scaffolding the process is compatible with independent thinking; supplying the answer is not.
A school fair can recognise several kinds of success. Alongside an overall project award, consider categories such as clearest question, strongest use of evidence, most thoughtful redesign, best explanation of an unexpected result or most effective communication. Publish the criteria before students begin.
Judges should ask questions that uncover reasoning:
This approach prevents surface polish from dominating. It also gives students useful feedback whether or not they continue to a regional event.
The official registration page identifies the current programme as SciFest@School 2026/2027. A teacher or school organiser should register, read the current terms and use the supplied resources. Because the school decides the event date, create an internal calendar with milestones for idea approval, consent, evidence collection, display completion and the fair itself.
If projects may later enter SciFest@College, check the separate regional deadline early. For 2027, college entry closes on Thursday 11 March, with the full form expected by the end of January. A school fair held after that date can still be valuable, but it cannot serve as preparation for the same regional cycle.
Families comparing formats can read What Is a Project-Based Competition? and Science Fair vs Olympiad. SciFest@School is strongest when the school wants a supported first experience that ends in a real audience.
Information checked on 8 September 2026.
EXPLORE NEXT
Guide
A practical guide to the two-minute science video, 2026 eligibility, peer review and what the judging criteria really demand.
Guide
Read the logic beneath playful tasks and use the result as diagnostic evidence
Guide
How schools can turn a fast, wide-ranging quiz into positive physics enrichment
Comments
Share a question, note, or update.
No comments yet.