Scholastic Art & Writing Awards
Rated Advanced, This long-running creative programme accepts original art and writing across many categories, beginning with regional review and continuing to national consideration. Students in grades 7–12 who are at least 13 enter online through their assigned region in the United States or eligible Canadian locations. Strong entries combine accomplished craft with originality and a distinctive personal voice, often after substantial development and revision.
Information pending verification
Competition details can change. Always confirm dates, eligibility and entry requirements on the official organiser's website.
Official website ↗OVERALL COMPETITION LEVEL
Advanced Level
5 evaluation dimensions have source-backed automatic scores; 1 dimensions need conflict review.
Competition overview
Key information
Eligible ages
13–19
School level
Grades 7–12
Registration method
Individual Allowed
Competition stages
Regional judging followed by national judging and National Awards Week
Fee
$15 individual entry; $40 portfolio; fee waivers available
Online / in-person
Online
Dates
Competition timeline
Registration opens
1 Oct 2026
Registration closes
6 Jan 2027
Competition starts
1 Dec 2026
Competition ends
11 Jun 2027
Editorial perspective
Our Take
The Scholastic Art & Writing Awards began in 1923 under Maurice R. Robinson, the founder of Scholastic Inc.; the Alliance for Young Artists & Writers was formed in 1994 to manage the expanding programme. Its founding idea was unusually direct: creative teenagers should have their work taken seriously and celebrated with the same public energy given to young athletes. A century later, the Alliance still frames the programme around recognition, exhibition, publication and support for young artists and writers rather than around a single school assignment. What makes Scholastic distinctive is the combination of extraordinary breadth and a very compact editorial standard. Work across visual and literary forms is reviewed anonymously against originality, skill and the emergence of a personal voice or vision. The official juror history includes figures such as Langston Hughes, Judy Blume, Billy Collins, Edwidge Danticat, David Sedaris, Nikki Giovanni, Ocean Vuong and Elizabeth Acevedo. That is a varied group, but the published criteria do not ask entrants to imitate any one established style; they ask whether the work makes purposeful choices and sounds or looks like its own maker. Recent official portfolio features show how that principle works in practice. Jack Adams's visual portfolio, The New Cave Culture, connects early human communication with present-day uncertainty about humanity's direction. Joyce Kim's portfolio turns her experience of immigration and discomfort with change into a sustained exploration of control, fear, perfectionism and acceptance. These are very different projects, yet both are coherent bodies of work built around a specific preoccupation rather than collections of unrelated polished pieces. Those cases suggest an editorial preference for work whose craft serves an identifiable point of view. Technical finish counts, but it is not enough by itself, and fashionable subject matter is not a substitute for sustained attention. From CompeteMap's perspective, this is the programme's real value: it treats teenagers as developing artists and writers with something particular to say, while exposing their work to readers and jurors drawn from the wider creative world. Students should notice that seriousness, not merely the famous alumni list.
Read full guide →Source information
Related competitions
Mathematics & Problem Solving · Advanced Level
MathWorks Math Modeling Challenge (M3 Challenge)
View competition →Computing & AI · Advanced Level
CyberPatriot National Youth Cyber Defense Competition
View competition →Mathematics & Problem Solving · Advanced Level