← Back to competitions
ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGYUNITED STATES✓ VERIFIED · LAST CHECKED 19 SEPT 2026

Samsung Solve for Tomorrow (USA)

Rated Advanced, Samsung Solve for Tomorrow asks public-school teams to frame a real community problem and move a STEM solution from an initial concept toward a persuasive, testable proposal. The United States programme is school-led for grades 6-12, with one team entered by an eligible adult employee. Competitive teams need credible community research, practical STEM reasoning, iterative design, teamwork, and increasingly polished communication across each round.

Verified information

Competition details can change. Always confirm dates, eligibility and entry requirements on the official organiser's website.

Official website ↗

OVERALL COMPETITION LEVEL

Advanced Level

5 evaluation dimensions have source-backed automatic scores; 1 dimensions need conflict review.

01

Competition overview

Key information

Eligible ages

11–18

School level

Grades 6-12 public schools

Registration method

School Only

Competition stages

Open application; 100 semifinalist videos; 10 finalist presentations

Fee

Free

Online / in-person

Hybrid

02

Dates

Competition timeline

Registration opens

30 Sept 2026

Registration closes

23 Nov 2026

Competition starts

30 Sept 2026

Competition ends

21 Apr 2027

03

Editorial perspective

Our Take

Samsung Solve for Tomorrow asks public-school teams to use STEM in response to a community problem. The familiar phrase can produce vague projects: an app for wellbeing, a sensor for safety, a campaign for sustainability. The competition becomes meaningful only when a team can show whose problem it is, what currently happens and why the proposed technical intervention might change that situation. The staged format is useful. An initial written application has to make the case economically; later teams must demonstrate the idea through video and presentation. That development exposes whether the project has substance. A concept that sounds impressive in five answers may become difficult to explain once judges ask about users, testing, cost, maintenance or unintended effects. From an editor's perspective, the contest is best for schools that can protect student ownership while offering practical support. A teacher can organise access and safety, but students should remain visible in problem definition, design choices and interpretation of evidence. The goal is not a corporate-looking pitch. It is a credible account of a team learning enough to make a responsible intervention.

Read full guide →
Source information

Related competitions

Mathematics & Problem Solving · Advanced Level

MathWorks Math Modeling Challenge (M3 Challenge)

View competition →

Science & Research · Advanced Level

Genes in Space

View competition →

Computing & AI · Advanced Level

CyberPatriot National Youth Cyber Defense Competition

View competition →

Mathematics & Problem Solving · Advanced Level

American Mathematics Competition 10 (AMC 10)

View competition →

Related blog posts

Guide

Samsung Solve for Tomorrow: make the problem measurable

Read article →