Samsung Solve for Tomorrow (USA)
Rated Advanced, Samsung Solve for Tomorrow asks public-school teams to frame a real community problem and move a STEM solution from an initial concept toward a persuasive, testable proposal. The United States programme is school-led for grades 6-12, with one team entered by an eligible adult employee. Competitive teams need credible community research, practical STEM reasoning, iterative design, teamwork, and increasingly polished communication across each round.
Verified information
Competition details can change. Always confirm dates, eligibility and entry requirements on the official organiser's website.
Official website ↗OVERALL COMPETITION LEVEL
Advanced Level
5 evaluation dimensions have source-backed automatic scores; 1 dimensions need conflict review.
Competition overview
Key information
Eligible ages
11–18
School level
Grades 6-12 public schools
Registration method
School Only
Competition stages
Open application; 100 semifinalist videos; 10 finalist presentations
Fee
Free
Online / in-person
Hybrid
Dates
Competition timeline
Registration opens
30 Sept 2026
Registration closes
23 Nov 2026
Competition starts
30 Sept 2026
Competition ends
21 Apr 2027
Editorial perspective
Our Take
Samsung Solve for Tomorrow asks public-school teams to use STEM in response to a community problem. The familiar phrase can produce vague projects: an app for wellbeing, a sensor for safety, a campaign for sustainability. The competition becomes meaningful only when a team can show whose problem it is, what currently happens and why the proposed technical intervention might change that situation. The staged format is useful. An initial written application has to make the case economically; later teams must demonstrate the idea through video and presentation. That development exposes whether the project has substance. A concept that sounds impressive in five answers may become difficult to explain once judges ask about users, testing, cost, maintenance or unintended effects. From an editor's perspective, the contest is best for schools that can protect student ownership while offering practical support. A teacher can organise access and safety, but students should remain visible in problem definition, design choices and interpretation of evidence. The goal is not a corporate-looking pitch. It is a credible account of a team learning enough to make a responsible intervention.
Read full guide →Source information
Related competitions
Mathematics & Problem Solving · Advanced Level
MathWorks Math Modeling Challenge (M3 Challenge)
View competition →Computing & AI · Advanced Level
CyberPatriot National Youth Cyber Defense Competition
View competition →Mathematics & Problem Solving · Advanced Level