Future City High School
Rated Advanced, Students work in small teams to design a plausible fire-resilient city and communicate the result through writing, digital modelling, and a live defence. The high-school programme uses an adult-coached team route and a United States national-final structure. The work spans research, engineering trade-offs, Revit modelling, sustained teamwork, and concise presentation under questioning.
Verified information
Competition details can change. Always confirm dates, eligibility and entry requirements on the official organiser's website.
Official website ↗OVERALL COMPETITION LEVEL
Advanced Level
5 evaluation dimensions have source-backed automatic scores; 1 dimensions need conflict review.
Competition overview
Key information
Eligible ages
14–18
School level
High school
Registration method
School or Individual
Competition stages
Qualification essay and Revit city model; national final presentation and Q&A
Fee
Program Access $300; Competition Access $375; teams should also budget for materials
Online / in-person
Hybrid
Dates
Competition timeline
Registration opens
Not yet announced by the organiser
Registration closes
Not yet announced by the organiser
Competition starts
13 Feb 2027
Competition ends
17 Feb 2027
Editorial perspective
Our Take
Future City High School is the older-student branch of DiscoverE's long-running city-design programme. Its value is not that students can make a futuristic skyline; it is that a team must decide how a city works under pressure. The current fire-resilience brief forces entrants to connect infrastructure, public safety, land use and human behaviour, then express those decisions in forms that other people can interrogate. The essay, Revit model and presentation are not three separate assignments. A convincing entry lets each expose a different part of the same argument: the essay explains assumptions and trade-offs, the model shows whether the design is spatially coherent, and the presentation demonstrates that the team understands its own choices. That integration is what distinguishes the programme from a general architecture visualisation exercise. From an editor's perspective, this competition is worth attention for students who enjoy systems thinking and can tolerate revision. It is less suitable for a team that wants to divide the work into isolated pieces and assemble them at the end. The most promising preparation is a shared design log in which every major feature has a reason, a dependency and a foreseeable consequence.
Read full guide →Source information
Related competitions
Mathematics & Problem Solving · Advanced Level
MathWorks Math Modeling Challenge (M3 Challenge)
View competition →Computing & AI · Advanced Level
CyberPatriot National Youth Cyber Defense Competition
View competition →Mathematics & Problem Solving · Advanced Level